The analysis of lecturers’ role in forming classroom interaction among students: A case study at Smaratungga Buddhist Study College

Authors

  • Budiyanto STIAB Smaratungga
  • Sri Wuli Fitriati Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Partono STIAB Smaratungga
  • Budi Utomo STIAB Smaratungga
  • Kabri STIAB Smaratungga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70152/leotech.v1i1.2

Keywords:

Classroom interaction, EFL, Lecturers’ role

Article Metrics

Abstract

The importance of classroom interaction in EFL (English as a Foreign Language) instruction is occasionally lost on educators. The interaction in the classroom is crucial to assimilating and embracing the target language. As a result of successful information transfer from the teacher to the students, good contact can lead to an increase in students' language acquisition. Because the focus of the classroom interaction study is on how interlocutors make meaning of one another's contributions, the findings can be used as a diagnostic tool to identify issues with discourse management and crucial occurrences that learners confront. Researchers used qualitative methods, including discourse analysis and case studies. Smaratungga Buddhist College Study College was conducted this investigation. The researchers anticipate that learners will be motivated and inspired by the interactional situation. This study focuses on how the teacher creates interaction in the classroom. The success of all outcomes depends on how well students interact. Researchers agree with their actions while they are interacting with the teacher or one another.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, J. W., & Bickhard, M. H. (2022). Emergent constructivism: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Human Development, 1-19.

Alika, S. D. (2017). The Violation of Language Politeness Principles in the Interaction of Indonesian Language Teaching And Learning). Jalabahasa, 13(1), 39-49.

Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.

Apriani, R. and Diana, M. 2018. An Analysis of Teacher Questioning in the Classroom Interaction. Project. 1 (4). Pp 400-405.

Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71-81.

Fitriarti, S. W. and Agatha, L. 2020. Discourse Studies in English Language Education. UNNES PRESS: Semarang.

Fitriati, S.W. et al. 2017. Teachers’ Questioning Strategies to Elicit Students’ Verbal Responses in EFL Classes at a Secondary School. English Education Journal. 5 (2). Pp 217-226.

Gardner, R. (2019). Classroom interaction research: The state of the art. Research on language and social interaction, 52(3), 212-226.

Ginting, S. A. 2017. The Importance of Opening Moves in Classroom Interaction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 8 (6). Pp 4-11.

Glaser, R., & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning theory and the study of instruction. Annual review of psychology, 40(1), 631-666.

Gustems, S. et al. 2019. Stress, coping strategies and academic achievement in teacher education students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 375-390.

Khoiriyah, L., & Mujiyanto, J. (2022). The Realization of Formulaic Competence in the Classroom Interactions among Learners in Kampung Inggris Pare. English Education Journal, 140-149.

Kumpulainen, K., & Wray, D. (2003). Classroom interactions and social learning: From theory to practice. Routledge.

Nashruddin and Putri, R.N. 2020. English as Foreign Language (EFL) Teacher’s Questioning Strategies in Classroom Interaction. The journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education. 2 (1). Pp 5-11.

Nguyen, H., & Santagata, R. (2021). Impact of computer modeling on learning and teaching systems thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 58(5). Pp 661-688.

Nilsson, M. (2020). Beliefs and experiences in the English classroom: Perspectives of Swedish primary school learners. Studies in second language learning and teaching, 10(2), 257-281.

Nurpahmi, S. (2017). Teacher talk in classroom interaction. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 3(1), 34-43.

Rahayuningsih, D. et al. 2020. The Realization of Politeness Strategies in EFL Teacher-Students Classroom Interaction. English Education Journal. 10 (1). Pp 85 – 93.

Rasmitadila, R., et al. (2020). Teachers’ Instructional Interaction in an Inclusive Classroom: Interaction between General Teacher and Special Assistant Teacher. International Journal of Special Education (IJSE), 35(1), 19-28.

Sari, M.N. et al. 2018. Classroom Interaction Patterns and Teacher or Students Percepcion on English Classes at SMAN 2 Bukit Tinggi West Sumatera. Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Seni. 19 (2). Pp.

Sharma, A. 2020. Classroom Interactions between Teacher Educators and Prospective Teachers: An Analysis during Curriculum Transaction in Secondary Teacher Education Programme. International Journal of Education, Modern Management, Applied Science & Social Science 2 (4). Pp 175-183.

Smith, H., & Higgins, S. (2006). Opening classroom interaction: The importance of feedback. Cambridge journal of education, 36(4), 485-502.

Yanti, N. P. W. K. et al. 2017. An Analysis of Classroom Interaction in English Language Learning Based on the Curriculum 2013 at SMA N 2 Tabanan. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris undiksha, 5(2).

Yuliansyah, A., & Ayu, M. (2021). The implementation of project-based assignment in online learning during covid-19. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 32-38.

Yusro, A. et al. 2020. The Application of Cooperative Principles in EFL Classroom Interaction: The Case of SMAN 4 Pekalongan. English Education Journal. 10 (2). Pp 124-130.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

Budiyanto, Fitriati, S. W., Partono, Utomo, B., & Kabri. (2024). The analysis of lecturers’ role in forming classroom interaction among students: A case study at Smaratungga Buddhist Study College. LEOTECH: Journal of Learning Education and Technology, 1(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.70152/leotech.v1i1.2