GENFABET: Generasi Pendidikan Dasar is dedicated to providing quick and equitable editorial decisions through a constructive and informative review process. We view editorial autonomy as a crucial element in our objective to disseminate scientific publications of the highest quality. In this journal, editors possess complete authority over the selection of papers deemed suitable for publishing. All published articles, except editorial manuscripts, undergo a stringent blind peer review process.

All submitted manuscripts must adhere to the following standards:

1. The article must align with the aims and scope of GENFABET.
2. The manuscript must be the authors' unique work.
3. Manuscripts must adhere to GENFABET's publication ethics and author guidelines.
4. The manuscript must exhibit proficient use of the English language.

All submitted manuscripts are getting initial screening by the editorial office and the editor-in-chief to verify compliance with the aforementioned criteria. At this juncture, the manuscript may be returned to the author for correction or rejected without further evaluation. Manuscripts that successfully undergo the initial screening will be assigned to section editors tasked with managing all further phases of the editorial process. Section editors are appointed according to their expertise and suitability for the manuscript's subject matter. The section editor thereafter solicits external blind peer reviewers to assess the manuscript's originality and quality. All reviewers are encouraged to adhere to the review guidelines established by GENFABET. The section editor will make the final editorial decision about the manuscript's acceptance based on the reviews of at least two expert reviewers. In case of a conflict of interest, an alternate section editor or peer reviewer must be appointed. The section editor will render the ultimate editorial decision on the manuscript's acceptance based on the reviews of a minimum of two reviewers. In cases of a conflict of interest, a section editor or an alternative reviewer must be appointed.

Special Issues: GENFABET may publish special issues that focus on current issues and challenges across diverse scientific disciplines, reflecting its dedication to fostering innovation. The editor-in-chief, in collaboration with the editorial board, determines special issue subjects based on their relevance, urgency, and compatibility with the journal's aims and scope. We subject manuscripts submitted for special issues to the same rigorous blind peer review process as standard manuscripts. Editors, reviewers, and authors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, and COPE principles and procedures will govern their management.

An author dissatisfied with the editorial process or decision may submit a thorough complaint or appeal to the GENFABET ethical team through the journal's official email. All complaints or appeals will be meticulously examined in accordance with the flowchart and COPE standards.