The Impact of Teacher Interaction and Knowledge Mastery on Students’ English Class Satisfaction

Authors

  • Delita Rosliana Institut Prima Bangsa
  • Dhevina Tiara Dharmansyah Institut Prima Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70152/mirej.v1i2.166

Keywords:

english, Student Satisfaction, High school, interaction, learning materials

Article Metrics

Abstract

This study examines the effect of teacher-student interaction and teacher knowledge mastery on student satisfaction in English language learning classes. The quantitative method uses a purposive sampling technique, with the number of data collected as many as 291 respondents aged 16 to 26 years consisting of high school and university students through a structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings indicate that only measurement constructs related to evaluation and assessment significantly affect student satisfaction. In contrast, teacher qualifications and interactions do not show statistically significant direct or indirect effects. These results indicate that the level of student satisfaction is mainly shaped by how effectively teachers carry out assessments, highlighting the importance of clear, objective, and transparent evaluation methods in English language teaching.

References

Alma. (2016). Guru profesional menguasai metode dan terampil mengajar. 2009, 1–23.

Amaliyah, A., & Rosdiana, R. (2023). Pengaruh Sarana Prasarana dan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Belajar Siswa SD YPW Krakatau Steel V Kota Cilegon. Jurnal Mirai Management, 8(3), 347–354. https://journal.stieamkop.ac.id/index.php/mirai/article/view/5950%0Ahttps://journal.stieamkop.ac.id/index.php/mirai/article/download/5950/3976

BANDURA, A. (2021). Creative Efficacy Toolbox: Introducing a Professional Development Model for Creatives. In College Music Symposium (Vol. 61, Issue 1, pp. 76–85). https://doi.org/10.18177/sym.2020.61.1.sr.11518

Becker, G. S. (1986). Human Capital Theorical. Archives of Neurology, 43(1), 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1986.00520010054022

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. In International Journal of Phytoremediation (Vol. 21, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Creswell, J. W. (2018). A Mixed-Method Approach. In Writing Center Talk over Time. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469237-3

Crosby, P. (2020). Philip B. Crosby. Quality, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203027790-14

Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845

Deasy Yunita Siregar, Aisyah Rizqa Fitri Siregar, Anggi Rahmanida Nst, Rahma Fitri Yani Lubis, & Rahmi Rahmita Tanjung. (2023). Problematika Guru Bahasa Inggris dalam Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di SD Negeri 067090 Medan. Simpati, 2(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.59024/simpati.v2i1.518

Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00462.x

Goe, L., & Croft, A. (2009). Methods of Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality, March, 1–12.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) - Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian Ringle, Marko Sarstedt. In Sage.

Hattie, J. (1999). Influences on student learning. r. Inaugural Lecture given on August, January 1999, 1–29. http://www.education.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/education/staff/j.hattie/papers/influences.cfm

Hoy, T.-M. en. (2001). Tscannen-Moran en Hoy, Capturing An Elusive Construct 2001.pdf.

Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., Giliatt, N., & Mee, J. F. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806

Karen S. Cook , Coye Cheshire , Eric R. W. Rice, and S. N. I. (2006). Social Exchange Theory. Handbook of Social Psychology, June, 571. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0

Linda Darling. (2011). Teacher quality and student achievement. Teacher Quality and Student Achievement, 8(1), 1–215. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000

Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The Key to Classroom Management. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 6–13.

Munirah. (2020). Menjadi Guru Beretika Dan Profesional.

Oliver. (2016). Kompetensi Dan Kinerja Guru Berdasarkan Sertifikasi Profesi. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 1(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v1i1.3269

Pianta, R. (2020). Hubungan Antara Relasi Guru-Anak Dengan Kemampuan Keaksaraan Anak Usia 5-6 Tahun. Kumara Cendekia, 8(3), 253. https://doi.org/10.20961/kc.v8i3.42603

Polii, D. J., & Polii, M. (2022). Manajemen Pendidikan Agama Kristen dalam Ketahanan Keluarga. EDULEAD: Journal of Christian Education and Leadership, 3(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.47530/edulead.v3i1.99

Rina Hastari. (2022). Hubungan Kompetensi Guru dan Kepuasan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Kependidikan, 10(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v10i1.6897

Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers,School,and Academic Achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.

Samson Balogun, O., Adewale Olaleye, S., Joshua, O., & Joshua Ibidoja, O. (2020). Academic Performance: An Approach of Tau Statistic. University Student’s Academic Performance: An Approach of Tau Statistic” Proceedings of the 36th International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA), November, 6169–6181. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac

Shulman. (1987). Knowledge and teaching Foundations of the new reform.

Stronge, J. (2015). Effective Teachers. In SAGE Open (Vol. 5, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015603427

Tarumasely, M., & Setyaadi, E. (2013). Pengaruh Pengelolaan Kelas Terhadap Keefektifan Belajar PAK pada Peserta Didik Kelas VII di SMP BOPKRI 3 Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Agama Kristen, Musik Gerejawi Dan Konseling Kristen, IV(2), 1–25.

Ummah, M. S. (2019). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Issue 1). http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

Vygotsky. (2011). Vygotsky ’ s Theory of Cognitive Development Vygotsky ’ s Theory of Cognitive Development. 84(August), 224–252.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

How to Cite

Rosliana, D., & Dharmansyah, D. T. (2025). The Impact of Teacher Interaction and Knowledge Mastery on Students’ English Class Satisfaction. MIREJ: Multidisciplinary Innovation Research Journal, 1(2), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.70152/mirej.v1i2.166

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): MIREJ: Multidisciplinary Innovation Research Journal

Section

Reseacrh Article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Delita Rosliana, Dhevina Tiara Dharmansyah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright for this article is held by the journal MIREJ: Multidisciplinary Innovation Research Journal and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). The article may be used, shared, and adapted for any purpose with proper attribution and distribution under the same license. Full license details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/