Explanatory Factor Analysis of Critical Thinking Instrument for Elementary Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70152/mirej.v1i2.144Keywords:
critical thinking, elementary school, problem solving abilitiesArticle Metrics
Abstract
One of the main challenges in primary education is the low critical thinking skills of students during the learning process, which has a major impact on their academic achievement as well as their social and emotional development. This study aims to analyze the structure of the instrument factors for measuring critical thinking ability, which is developed based on four main dimensions: analytical ability, evaluation ability, inference ability, and problem-solving skills in elementary school students. This study uses a quantitative approach with a survey design involving 240 elementary school students. Data analysis was carried out through Explanatory Factor Analysis (EFA). The findings show that the four dimensions of critical thinking have significant factor weight, adequate convergent validity, and high construct reliability, as well as SRMR values that have a match with empirical data. The model created can describe well and in context how critical thinking works as a whole. This instrument is relevant for academic research as well as a diagnostic tool for teachers in designing responsive learning. These findings contribute significantly to improving the quality of basic education through a comprehensive and effective evaluation of students' critical thinking skills.
References
Amini, R. P. (2023). Analisis Validasi dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Sekolah Dasar. Edukatika, 01(01), 1–10. https://journal2.upgris.ac.id/index.php/edukatika/
Astiwi, K. P. T., Antara, P. A., & Agustiana, I. G. A. T. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SD pada Mata Pelajaran PPKn. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 3(3), 459. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v3i3.29457
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.pp
Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework For Any Discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160–166.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective Part II. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(2), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. Insight Assement.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2020). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer International Publishing.
Jamaluddin, J., Jufri, A. W., Muhlis, M., & Bachtiar, I. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pada Pembelajaran IPA di SMP. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i1.1296
Jufri, W. (2013). Belajar dan Pembelajaran SAINS. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka. Reka Cipta. 1(176), 8–23.
Kartimi, & Liliasari. (2012). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Berpikir Kritis pada Konsep Termokimia untuk Siswa SMA Peringkat Atas dan Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v1i1.2008
King, A., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (1998). Higher order thinking skills: Definition, teaching strategies, assessment. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling fifth edition. The Guidford Press.
Norris, S.P., and Ennis, R. (1989). Evaluating Critical Thinking. Midwest Publications.
Paul, R., & Linda, E. (2014). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. In Alvabeta. CV.
Susanti, E., Sutisnawati, A., Nurasiah, I., & Kritis, B. (2019). Penerapan Model Group Investigation untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa di Kelas Tinggi. Jurnal Kependidikan Utile, V(2), 123–133.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Febrian Adi Guna, Sahal Abdullah, Muhamad Azlan Al Disa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is held by the journal MIREJ: Multidisciplinary Innovation Research Journal and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). The article may be used, shared, and adapted for any purpose with proper attribution and distribution under the same license. Full license details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/








