The Effectiveness of Learning Motivation on Science Literacy in Elementary School Students

Authors

  • Anisya Fitriani Institut Prima Bangsa
  • Putri Melianti Institut Prima Bangsa
  • Adinda Wulan Fitriyah Institut Prima Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70152/mirej.v2i1.104

Keywords:

learning motivation, science literacy, science learning

Article Metrics

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relationship between learning motivation and science literacy in primary school students. Motivation is an important factor in learning, while science literacy plays a role in developing critical and analytical thinking skills. Using a quantitative approach and correlational survey design, data were obtained from a sample size of 50 students (n = 50) from five public elementary schools in Cirebon, Indonesia. The research instrument consisted of a Likert scale questionnaire to measure the level of motivation as well as a written test to assess science literacy. The results of descriptive statistical analysis showed that students' motivation level was high, with an mean score of 31.82 out of 40. In contrast, science literacy was in the medium category, with an mean score of 16.02 out of 26. The correlational findings indicated that high motivation does not always go hand in hand with improved science literacy. This suggests that internal motivation needs to be balanced with relevant and contextualized learning strategies. Thus, effective science education demands an integrated approach that not only facilitates students' affective aspects but also enriches learning experiences through explorative and meaningful methods. The main contribution of this study lies in emphasizing the importance of integration.

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118

Anggraini, F. D. P., Aprianti, A., Setyawati, V. A. V., & Hartanto, A. A. (2022). Pembelajaran statistika menggunakan software SPSS untuk uji validitas dan reliabilitas. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6491–6504. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3206

Barus, R. A., Rusilowati, A., & Ridlo, S. (2024). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan instrumen tes penilaian literasi sains berorientasi TIMSS siswa sd kelas V. Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pengembangan Sekolah Dasar, 12(1), 68–85.

Cavagnetto, A., Hand, B. M., & Norton-Meier, L. (2010). The nature of elementary student science discourse in the context of the science writing heuristic approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32(4), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802627277

Cavell, A. J. (1954). A rapid method for the determination of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in plant materials. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 5(4), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740050407

Dani, D. (2009). Scientific literacy and purposes for teaching science: A case study of Lebanese private school teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 289–299.

Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20414

Fetra Bonita Sari, Risda Amini, M. (2020). Implementasi literasi sains dalam pembelajaran ipa di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3(2), 524–532. https://journal.uii.ac.id/ajie/article/view/971

Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., Scafiddi, N. T., & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.331

Hadiyati, N., & Wijayanti, A. (2017). Keefektifan metode eksperimen berbantu media benda konkret terhadap hasil belajar ipa siswa kelas V sekolah dasar. JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 1(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v1i1.513

Hair Jr., J. F., Gabriel, M. L. D. da S., & Patel, V. K. (2014). Modelagem de equações estruturais baseada em covariância (CB-SEM) com o AMOS: Orientações sobre a sua aplicação como uma Ferramenta de Pesquisa de Marketing. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2718

Hamdu, G., & Agustina, L. (2011). Pengaruh motivasi belajar siswa terhadap prestasi belajar ipa di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 12(1), 25–33.

Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20404

Juniawan, E. R., Salsabila, V. H., Prasetya, A. T., & Rengga, W. D. P. (2023). Studi Literatur: Analisis media pembelajaran ipa untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa sekolah dasar. Cokroaminoto Journal of Primary Education, 6(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.622023.2608

Kamaladini, Gani, A. A., & Sari, N. (2021). Pengembangan media papan edukasi pintar dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Seminar Nasional Paedagoria , 1(September), 93–100. http://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/fkip

Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., & Melsayanti, R. (2019). Students’ attitude towards natural sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.16395

L, & Education, MoOf, I. J. (2025). Development, validity and realiability of deep reading abilty questionnaire for primary school. 7(24), 933–949. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJMOE.724067

Lestari, Y. (2018). Penanaman nilai peduli lingkungan dalam pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam. Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 4(2), 332–337.

Mantzicopoulos, P., Patrick, H., & Samarapungavan, A. (2008). Young children’s motivational beliefs about learning science. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.04.001

McFarlane, D. A. (2013). Understanding the hallenges of Scsience education in the 21st Century: New Opportunities for Scientific Literacy. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 4, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.4.35

Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation, January, 8.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667

Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran ipa abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran …, 9, 34–42.

Prihartanta, W. (2015). Teori-teori motivasi prestasi. Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, 1(83), 1–11.

Puspitasari, T., & Anggraeni, D. (2019). Pendekatan games Ddalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa bagi relawan gemma insani indonesia. Jurnal Komunitas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(2), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.31334/jks.v2i1.288

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327

Schrepp, M. (2020). On the usage of cronbach’s alpha to measure reliability of ux scales. Journal of Usability Studies, 15(4), 247–258.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of cronbach’alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9133-y

Wang, J. H., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Judy huei-yu wang. 39(2), 162–186.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Fitriani, A., Melianti, P., & Fitriyah, A. W. (2026). The Effectiveness of Learning Motivation on Science Literacy in Elementary School Students. MIREJ: Multidisciplinary Innovation Research Journal, 2(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.70152/mirej.v2i1.104

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): MIREJ: Multidisciplinary Innovation Research Journal

Section

Reseacrh Article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Anisya Fitriani, Putri Melianti, Adinda Wulan Fitriyah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright for this article is held by the journal MIREJ: Multidisciplinary Innovation Research Journal and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). The article may be used, shared, and adapted for any purpose with proper attribution and distribution under the same license. Full license details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/