University Students' Use of AI Chatbot Companions for Academic Help Seeking: Benefits and Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70152/duties.v2i2.432Article Metrics
Keywords:
academic help-seeking, AI chatbot companions, Artificial intelligence, Higher Education, qualitative researchAbstract
The increasing adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed the ways university students seek academic support, yet little is known about how AI chatbot companions are integrated into students' academic help-seeking behaviours. This qualitative study explored how university students use AI chatbot companions as part of their academic help-seeking processes and examined their perceptions of the benefits and challenges associated with their use. Guided by Karabenick and Dembo's (2011) academic help-seeking process model, the study employed a qualitative descriptive design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with university students who had experience using AI chatbot companions for academic purposes. The interview data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis through a hybrid deductive-inductive approach. The findings revealed that students incorporated AI chatbot companions into a dynamic help-seeking process by recognizing learning difficulties, strategically selecting AI as an academic help source, engaging in iterative dialogue, and critically evaluating AI-generated assistance before applying it to their learning. Participants perceived AI chatbot companions as accessible, personalized, and psychologically safe learning partners that supported self-regulated learning. However, they also expressed concerns regarding the reliability of AI-generated information, the need for information verification, and the potential risk of overreliance. The study extends Karabenick and Dembo's academic help-seeking process model by positioning AI chatbot companions as an emerging academic help source within higher education. The findings further highlight the importance of fostering AI literacy, critical evaluation skills, and responsible AI use to maximize the educational value of AI chatbot companions.
References
Akiba, D. (2025). ChatGPT told me to say it: AI chatbots and class participation apprehension in university students. Education Sciences, 15(7), 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070897
Akpan, I. J., Kobara, Y. M., Owolabi, J., Akpan, A. A., & Offodile, O. F. (2025). Conversational and generative artificial intelligence and human–chatbot interaction in education and research. International Transactions in Operational Research, 32(3), 1251–1281. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13522
Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2023). Modeling students’ perceptions of chatbots in learning: Integrating technology acceptance with the value-based adoption model. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111151
Al Mashagbeh, M., Alsharqawi, M., Tudevdagva, U., & Khasawneh, H. J. (2025). Student engagement with artificial intelligence tools in academia: A survey of Jordanian universities. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1550147
Ali, I., Warraich, N. F., & Butt, K. (2025). Acceptance and use of artificial intelligence and AI-based applications in education: A meta-analysis and future direction. Information Development, 41(3), 859–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241257206
Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620
Blahopoulou, J., & Ortiz-Bonnin, S. (2025). Student perceptions of ChatGPT: benefits, costs, and attitudinal differences between users and non-users toward AI integration in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(14), 19741–19764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13575-9
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine : A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative Medicine, 38(6), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241234800
Bravo, F. A., & Cruz-Bohorquez, J. M. (2024). Engineering education in the age of AI: Analysis of the impact of chatbots on learning in engineering. Education Sciences, 14(5), 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050484
Crawford, J., Allen, K. A., Pani, B., & Cowling, M. (2024). When artificial intelligence substitutes humans in higher education: the cost of loneliness, student success, and retention. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2326956
Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023). A meta-analysis and systematic review of the effect of chatbot technology use in sustainable education. Sustainability, 15(4), 2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042940
Denny, E., & Weckesser, A. (2022). How to do qualitative research? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 129(7), 1166–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17150
Dogru, E. Ö., & Krämer, N. C. (2025). Investigating appropriate reliance on AI-Based decision support systems: the role of expertise, trust, and self-confidence. Journal of Decision Systems, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2025.2593251
Ewell, S. N., Harvey, A., Clark, A., Maloney, M. E., Stevison, L. S., & Ballen, C. J. (2025). Instructor recommendations for student learning strategies and metacognition: An analysis of undergraduate biology syllabi. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(4), 1132–1158. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21996
Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544
Guan, R., Raković, M., Chen, G., & Gašević, D. (2025). How educational chatbots support self-regulated learning? A systematic review of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 30(4), 4493–4518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12881-y
Hadad, S. (2026). Factors influencing student help-seeking behavior during crisis: a mixed-method analysis in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 51(2), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2468842
Haroud, S., & Saqri, N. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on support, replacement, and digital literacy. Education Sciences, 15(4), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040396
Karabenick, S. A., & Dembo, M. H. (2011). Understanding and facilitating self‐regulated help seeking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.442
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Kofinas, A. K., Tsay, C. H., & Pike, D. (2025). The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(6), 2522–2549. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13585
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
Liu, G. L., Darvin, R., & Ma, C. (2024). Exploring AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): A mixed-method investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ AI adoption and experiences. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2310288
Lund, B. D., Teel, Z. A., Mohammed, Y., Jagathpally, A., & Wang, T. (2026). Artificial intelligence (AI) and information seeking: A comparative exploration of AI chatbots, search engines, and library resources as information sources among university students. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006261438484
McCutcheon, S., Wood, A., Bright, M., Jilina, P., & Walker, A. (2025). Student academic help seeking in higher education: Navigating Bronfenbrenner’s systems. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/jfn9df65
Neumann, A. T., Yin, Y., Sowe, S., Decker, S., & Jarke, M. (2025). An LLM-driven chatbot in higher education for databases and information systems. IEEE Transactions on Education, 68(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2024.3467912
Ozdemir, Z. M., & Yapici, E. (2025). Evaluating the accuracy, reliability, consistency, and readability of different large language models in restorative dentistry. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 37(7), 1740–1752. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13447
Ruihua, L., Hassan, N. C., & Wong, B. Y. (2026). How do first‐generation rural college students navigate academic help‐seeking? A qualitative investigation of influencing factors, processes and strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 2068–2090. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70106
Schei, O. M., Møgelvang, A., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024). Perceptions and use of AI chatbots among students in higher education: A scoping review of empirical studies. Education Sciences, 14(8), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080922
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: the role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x
Sharma, K., Nguyen, A., & Hong, Y. (2024). Self‐regulation and shared regulation in collaborative learning in adaptive digital learning environments: A systematic review of empirical studies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1398–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13459
Stratton, S. J. (2024). Purposeful sampling: Advantages and pitfalls. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 39(2), 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000281
Strzelecki, A. (2024). Students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovative Higher Education, 49(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1
Tian, W., Ge, J., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, X. (2024). AI Chatbots in Chinese higher education: adoption, perception, and influence among graduate students—an integrated analysis utilizing UTAUT and ECM models. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1268549
Usher, M., & Amzalag, M. (2025). From prompt to polished: Exploring student–chatbot interactions for academic writing assistance. Education Sciences, 15(3), 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030329
Villamin, P., Lopez, V., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2025). A worked example of qualitative descriptive design: A step‐by‐step guide for novice and early career researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(8), 5181–5195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16481
Wakelin, K. J., McAra-Couper, J., & Fleming, T. (2024). Using an online platform for conducting face-to-face interviews. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241234183
Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Tiranant, P., Jinowat, N., & Boonyakitanont, P. (2025). AI-driven chatbots in second language education: A systematic review of their efficacy and pedagogical implications. Ampersand, 14, 100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2025.100224
Williams, R. T. (2024). The ethical implications of using generative chatbots in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1331607
Yildiz Durak, H., & Onan, A. (2024). Predicting the use of chatbot systems in education: A comparative approach using PLS-SEM and machine learning algorithms. Current Psychology, 43(28), 23656–23674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06072-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Naufal Fidha Sulaeman, Kurnihayati Kurnihayati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is held by the authors under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). The article may be used, shared, and adapted for any purpose with proper attribution and distribution under the same license. Full license details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
