Loneliness and Social Connection in Online Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Study of University Students’ Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70152/duties.v2i2.367Article Metrics
Keywords:
belonging, loneliness, online higher education, social connection, social presence theoryAbstract
The rapid expansion of online higher education has transformed not only instructional practices but also students’ social and emotional learning experiences. This study explores university students’ experiences of loneliness and social connection in online higher education contexts through a convergent mixed-methods design grounded in Social Presence Theory. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently from university students who had experienced online learning for at least one academic semester. The quantitative phase involved an online survey administered to 102 students, while the qualitative phase consisted of semi-structured interviews with 12 purposively selected participants. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, whereas qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings revealed that students experienced moderately high levels of loneliness alongside moderate levels of social connection, peer interaction, instructor interaction, and sense of belonging in online learning environments. Qualitative findings further demonstrated that students frequently perceived online learning as emotionally distant and socially limited due to reduced interpersonal interaction, limited visibility, and minimal emotional engagement. However, meaningful social connection remained possible through collaborative activities, instructor responsiveness, and active participation. The integration of findings suggests that loneliness and social connection coexist dynamically within digitally mediated educational environments. The study highlights the importance of social presence, interpersonal responsiveness, and interaction quality in fostering emotionally supportive online higher education experiences.
References
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Armah, J. K., Bervell, B., & Bonsu, N. O. (2023). Modelling the role of learner presence within the community of inquiry framework to determine online course satisfaction in distance education. Heliyon, 9(5), e15803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15803
Aslan, Y., Koçak, O., Kaya, A. B., Alkhulayfi, A. M. A., Gómez-Salgado, J., & Yıldırım, M. (2025). Roles of loneliness and life satisfaction in the relationship between perceived friend social support, positive feelings about the future and loss of motivation. Acta Psychologica, 259, 105315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105315
Baimakhan, A., Belgibayeva, G., Sarybayeva, A., Baimakhanova, A., & Iskakova, P. (2024). Formation of communicative competence of students based on the use of digital technologies. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7512
Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 21(3), 63–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102939
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. In Sage Publications (p. 320). https://books.google.se/books?id=Hr11DwAAQBAJ&hl=sv
Buckley, J. B., Robinson, B. S., Tretter, T. R., Biesecker, C., Hammond, A. N., & Thompson, A. K. (2023). Belonging as a gateway for learning: First‐year engineering students’ characterizations of factors that promote and detract from sense of belonging in a pandemic. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(3), 816–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20529
Chaudhary, M. K., Mahato, S., & Adhikari, M. (2025). The effectiveness of online learning in the emerging academic environment: A structural equation modelling (SEM) approach. FIIB Business Review, 14(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145231210355
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dalsgaard, C., & Ryberg, T. (2023). A theoretical framework for digital learning spaces: Learning in individual spaces, working groups, communities of interest, and open connections. Research in Learning Technology, 31(1063519), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.3084
DiGiacomo, D. K., Usher, E. L., Han, J., Abney, J. M., Cole, A. E., & Patterson, J. T. (2023). The benefits of belonging: Students’ perceptions of their online learning experiences. Distance Education, 44(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2155615
Dulfer, N., Gowing, A., & Mitchell, J. (2025). Building belonging in online classrooms: Relationships at the core. Teaching in Higher Education, 30(4), 1024–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2024.2349993
Duran, A., Dahl, L. S., Stipeck, C., & Mayhew, M. J. (2020). A critical quantitative analysis of students’ sense of belonging: Perspectives on race, generation status, and collegiate environments. Journal of College Student Development, 61(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2020.0014
Gao, F., Wang, C., Xie, H., & Hong, J. (2024). Social interaction and online learning efficiency for middle school students: The mediating role of social presence and learning engagement. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100896
García-Machado, J. J., Martínez Ávila, M., Dospinescu, N., & Dospinescu, O. (2024). How the support that students receive during online learning influences their academic performance. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 20005–20029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12639-6
Hendrick, L., Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van der Vaart, W. (2023). Students’ academic engagement during COVID-19 times: A mixed-methods study into relatedness and loneliness during the pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1221003
Karhapää, A., Rikala, P., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., & Hämäläinen, R. (2024). Digital environments as sites for informal workplace learning in knowledge work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 36(9), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-11-2023-0184
Kitano, N., & Lane, M. (2025). Alone, together: How a strategy of writing, reflecting and relating helped research students deal with isolation. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 17(4), 1259–1274. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-10-2023-0485
Korthals Altes, T., Muftugil-Yalcin, S., & Slootman, M. (2023). Belonging in online synchronous classrooms: Experiences of minoritized students in Dutch higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 13(10), 986. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100986
Liang, Y., & Ren, L. (2025). A study of the impact of social presence on college students’ learning satisfaction in online learning contexts: A chain-mediated model. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 1123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03386-5
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is quantitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264622
Liu, Q., & Lin, D. (2024). The impact of distance education on the socialization of college students in the Covid-19 era: Problems in communication and impact on mental health. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 575. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05551-7
Malighetti, C., Bernardelli, L., Pancini, E., Riva, G., & Villani, D. (2023). Promoting emotional and psychological well-being during COVID-19 pandemic: A self-help virtual reality intervention for university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(4), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0246
Mexhuani, B. (2025). Adopting digital tools in higher education: Opportunities, challenges and theoretical insights. European Journal of Education, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12819
Minosky, S. A., Wiechers, M., & Landaverde-Umana, L. (2024). The impact of course format on student perceptions of the classroom learning environment and teamwork. Active Learning in Higher Education, 25(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221128023
Moseholm, E., & Fetters, M. D. (2017). Conceptual models to guide integration during analysis in convergent mixed methods studies. Methodological Innovations, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117703118
Octoyuda, E., Siagian, H. S. P., & Arisanti, I. (2025). Configuring video-based learning and online learning experience to shape students’ satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 26(2), 252–272. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1449659
Oyarzun, B., Kim, S., Maxwell, D., Schaefer, D., & Conklin, S. (2025). The design and effectiveness of online collaborative work. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09472-2
Özdoğru, A. A., Geçer, E., & Bağcı, H. (2025). Examining the role of social connectedness and sense of humor on social presence in online learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 30(16), 22803–22821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13666-7
Panjehfouladgaran, H., Stavropoulou, F., & Teimouri, M. (2025). How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected students’ online social presence? INFORMS Transactions on Education, 25(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2022.0054
Rakha, A. H. (2025). Promoting online teaching through active learning strategies: Applications and innovations. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1546208
Ransanz Reyes, E., Arana-Cuenca, A., & Manzanal Martínez, A. I. (2025). Recommendations for designing collaborative activities in online higher education: A systematic review. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 15(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2818
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
Slater, P., & Hasson, F. (2025). Quantitative data quality assurance, analysis and presentation. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 32(3), 723–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.13143
Vermeulen, E. J., & Volman, M. L. L. (2024). Promoting student engagement in online education: Online learning experiences of Dutch university students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(2), 941–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09704-3
Weidlich, J., Göksün, D. O., & Kreijns, K. (2023). Extending social presence theory: social presence divergence and interaction integration in online distance learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(3), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09325-2
Weng, A. K.-W., Chang, H.-Y., Lai, K.-K., & Lin, Y.-B. (2024). Topic modeling on peer interaction in online and mobile learning of higher education: 1993–2022. Education Sciences, 14(8), 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080867
Wheele, T., Lindkvist, C., Weber, C., Haugen, T., & Windlinger, L. (2026). Beyond the screen: Student experiences of social connection in a hybrid university learning environment. Learning, Media and Technology, 51(1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2024.2406963
Wheele, T. P., Lindkvist, C., Haugen, T., Weber, C., & Windlinger, L. (2025). “We are learning the hybrid communication culture”: Curating atmospheres of social connection for university students. Facilities, 43(7/8), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2024-0029
Wong, B. (2024). Exploring the spatial belonging of students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 49(3), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2243285
Zhong, Q., Wang, Y., Lv, W., Xu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Self-regulation, teaching presence, and social presence: Predictors of students’ learning engagement and persistence in blended synchronous learning. Sustainability, 14(9), 5619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095619
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Norazmie Yusof, Akbar Fauzan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is held by the authors under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). The article may be used, shared, and adapted for any purpose with proper attribution and distribution under the same license. Full license details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
