Who Am I as a Learner in the Age of Artificial Intelligence?: Exploring University Students' Identity Construction in AI-Mediated Learning

Authors

  • Roy Venketsamy University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
  • Naelul Rohmah Institut Prima Bangsa Cirebon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70152/duties.v2i2.362

Article Metrics

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into higher education has transformed how students access information, engage with learning tasks, and construct knowledge. While previous studies have primarily focused on the adoption, effectiveness, and ethical implications of AI-assisted learning, limited attention has been given to how AI influences students’ identities as learners. This study explores how university students construct their learner identities in the era of artificial intelligence. Employing a qualitative phenomenological design, the study involved six higher education students who regularly used generative AI technologies to support their academic learning. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The findings revealed four interconnected themes: becoming an AI-enhanced learner, negotiating independence and dependence in learning, redefining competence and expertise, and envisioning future-ready learner identities. Participants perceived AI as a learning companion that enhanced their capabilities while simultaneously requiring them to negotiate issues of autonomy, responsibility, and authenticity. The findings further indicated that students increasingly defined competence in terms of critical evaluation and effective human-AI collaboration rather than information acquisition alone. Moreover, participants’ engagement with AI was strongly connected to their aspirations for future academic and professional participation. The study contributes to the growing literature on AI in higher education by highlighting the identity-related dimensions of AI-mediated learning and offering insights into what it means to be a learner in an increasingly AI-driven educational landscape.

References

Alm, A. (2024). Exploring autonomy in the AI wilderness: Learner challenges and choices. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1369. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121369

Barnes, A. J., Zhang, Y., & Valenzuela, A. (2024). AI and culture: Culturally dependent responses to AI systems. Current Opinion in Psychology, 58, 101838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101838

Bećirović, S., Polz, E., & Tinkel, I. (2025). Exploring students’ AI literacy and its effects on their AI output quality, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00384-3

Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602

Canagarajah, S. (2023). Decolonization as pedagogy: A praxis of ‘becoming’ in ELT. ELT Journal, 77(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad017

Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, April, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Delcker, J., Heil, J., Ifenthaler, D., Seufert, S., & Spirgi, L. (2024). First-year students AI-competence as a predictor for intended and de facto use of AI-tools for supporting learning processes in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00452-7

Dodgson, J. E. (2023). Phenomenology: Researching the lived experience. Journal of Human Lactation, 39(3), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231176453

Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544

Fitriati, S. W., & Williyan, A. (2025). AI-enhanced self-regulated learning: EFL learners’ prioritization and utilization in presentation skills development. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(2), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202530647

Fošner, A. (2024). University students’ attitudes and perceptions towards AI tools: Implications for sustainable educational practices. Sustainability, 16(19), 8668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198668

Geampana, A., & Perrotta, M. (2025). Using interview excerpts to facilitate focus group discussion. Qualitative Research, 25(1), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241234283

Jensen, L. X., Buhl, A., Sharma, A., & Bearman, M. (2025). Generative AI and higher education: A review of claims from the first months of ChatGPT. Higher Education, 89(4), 1145–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01265-3

Johnston, H., Wells, R. F., Shanks, E. M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4

Khong, M. L., & Tanner, J. A. (2024). Surface and deep learning: A blended learning approach in preclinical years of medical school. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1029. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05963-5

Manosuthikit, A. (2025). Fostering Thai students’ identities and agency: Teacher strategies for TED‐Style presentations. TESOL Journal, 16(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.70033

Martín Ortega, E., & Solari Maccabelli, M. (2024). The role of reflection in learner identity construction. A sociocultural and dialogical approach. Journal for the Study of Education and Development: Infancia y Aprendizaje, 47(4), 744–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/02103702241286404

Msambwa, M. M., Wen, Z., & Daniel, K. (2025). The impact of AI on the personal and collaborative learning environments in higher education. European Journal of Education, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12909

Najmiah, L., & Al-Anbari, A. H. J. (2025). Narrative explorations of EFL learners’ engagement with AI tools in developing writing proficiency. DUTIES: Education and Humanities International Journal, 1(2), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.70152/duties.v1i2.222

Neupane, B. P. (2024). Sociocultural environment and agency in identity construction of English language teachers. The Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1948–1968. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6756

Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Multilingual Matters.

Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2025). Collaborative uses of GenAI tools in project-based learning. Education Sciences, 15(3), 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030354

Satvati, N., Kamali, J., Safian Boldaji, F., Khodadadi, M., & Akhondi, S. (2025). AI integration into language education and teacher identity: An ecological perspective. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 47, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.47.01

Sousa, A. E., & Cardoso, P. (2025). Use of generative AI by higher education students. Electronics, 14(7), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071258

Stratton, S. J. (2024). Purposeful sampling: Advantages and pitfalls. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 39(2), 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000281

Sun, L., & Zhou, L. (2024). Does generative artificial intelligence improve the academic achievement of college students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(7), 1676–1713. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241277937

Tenberga, I., & Daniela, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy competencies for teachers through self-assessment tools. Sustainability, 16(23), 10386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310386

Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343

Wang, N., Wang, X., & Su, Y.-S. (2024). Critical analysis of the technological affordances, challenges and future directions of Generative AI in education: A systematic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305156

Williams, R. T. (2024). The ethical implications of using generative chatbots in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1331607

Yamada, A. (2025). Advancing intercultural competence in higher education: Strategies for engaging generation Z. Education Sciences, 15(3), 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030341

Yeo, M. A. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) authoring apps. TESOL Journal, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

Venketsamy, R., & Rohmah, N. (2026). Who Am I as a Learner in the Age of Artificial Intelligence?: Exploring University Students’ Identity Construction in AI-Mediated Learning. DUTIES: Education and Humanities International Journal, 2(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.70152/duties.v2i2.362