Discourse Markers in Learners’ YouTube Comments: A Study of Informal Academic English

Authors

  • Raudhatul Haura Universitas Islam Kalimantan (UNISKA) Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari
  • Aloba Fatimah Musa Kwara State Universal Basic Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70152/duties.v1i2.226

Keywords:

academic discourse, discourse markers, EFL Learners, informal English, YouTube comments

Article Metrics

Abstract

This study investigates the use of discourse markers (DMs) by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in YouTube comments on academic-related videos. Drawing on Fraser’s typology, the research explores the types of DMs most frequently used and how learners employ them to structure arguments, express stance, and maintain coherence in informal academic English. A total of 300 learner comments, some from the same users, were collected from ten academic YouTube videos and analysed through qualitative content analysis. The findings reveal that learners primarily used contrastive, elaborative, and inferential discourse markers such as but, also, and therefore to organize ideas and express reasoning. Stance-related markers like I think and actually were also prevalent, signaling learners' personal evaluations. Additionally, elaborative markers contributed to textual flow and coherence. These patterns indicate that EFL learners are able to apply academic discourse strategies within informal digital contexts, demonstrating emerging discourse competence and pragmatic awareness. The study highlights the pedagogical potential of digital platforms like YouTube as spaces for meaningful language use and suggests incorporating informal online texts into language teaching practices.

References

Abu Athreh, M. Y., & Obeidat, H. (2022). The Perspectives of EFL Students at Yarmouk University towards using YouTube in learning and understanding English during Covid-19 pandemic. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 304. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p304

Azmuddin, R. A., Jamalai @ Jamali, M., Abdul Rahim, A. A., Azmat Ali, M. M., & Khamis, N. Y. (2022). Exploration of online discussion forum on reading EST texts for ESL learners. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.2.4

Barbara, S. W. Y., Afzaal, M., & Aldayel, H. S. (2024). A corpus-based comparison of linguistic markers of stance and genre in the academic writing of novice and advanced engineering learners. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 284. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02757-4

Chao, C. (2022). Being a YouTuber that language learners recognize: A study on constructing language teacher identities in social media community of practice. System, 109, 102860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102860

Colás-Bravo, P., & Quintero-Rodríguez, I. (2023). YouTube as a digital resource for sustainable education. Sustainability, 15(7), 5687.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075687

Crible, L. (2022). The syntax and semantics of coherence relations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 27(1), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19109.cri

Derakhshan, A., Karimpour, S., & Nazari, M. (2024). Interactional features in second language classroom discourse: variations across novice and experienced language teachers. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(6), 2323–2349. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2023-0001

Ebrahimi, H., & Xodabande, I. (2023). The functions of discourse markers in L2 teachers’ and learners’ speech across gender and proficiency: A corpus study. Mextesol Journal, 47(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v47n1-10

Fraser, B. (2010). An account of discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics, 1(2), 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909x12538045489818

Fu, Y., & Ho, V. (2022). Discourse markers in TV interviews: A corpus-based comparative study of Chinese and the western media. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1063158

Guydish, A. J., Nguyen, A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2024). Discourse markers in small talk and tasks. Discourse Studies, 26(5), 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456241230253

Herman, T. (2022). Ethos and pragmatics. Languages, 7(3), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030165

Kim, H., Chapelle, C. A., & Sollier, N. (2024). Online fan practices and informal language learning. CALICO Journal, 41(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.25577

Kitjaroonchai, N., & Loo, D. B. (2023). Who are active and inactive participants in online collaborative writing? Considerations from an EFL setting. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(10), 2565–2576. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.15

Koops, C., & Lohmann, A. (2022). Explaining reversible discourse marker sequences: A case study of and and so. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.014

Langer, E. C., & Crume, P. K. (2023). Classroom discourse: What is conveyed through educational interpretation. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 29(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enad021

Mahmud, M. M., Fatima, T., Lashari, T. A., & Waheed, Z. (2023). Exploring the impact of Web 2.0 tools on 21st century skills of EFL learners in Pakistan. Education Sciences, 13(4), 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040384

Morady Moghaddam, M. (2023). Discourse markers in L2 learners’ responses to teacher‐ generated compliments during classroom interaction. Foreign Language Annals, 56(4), 1035–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12714

O. AbuSa’aleek, A. (2022). Exploring the use of discourse markers in EFL students’ writing through Google Docs. World Journal of English Language, 12(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n2p124

Pelttari, S. (2023). YouTube: Audience emotional reactions and convergent alignment.

Internet Pragmatics, 6(1), 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00085.pel

Rabab’ah, G., Ma’touq, A., & Alghazo, S. (2022). Discourse markers in narrative essays: A case study of Jordanian high school EFL learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 14(1), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.14.1.11

Recio Fernández, I., Loureda, Ó., & Cruz, A. (2023). Adjustment, mismatches and accommodation of procedural and conceptual meaning. Functions of Language, 30(1), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22020.rec

Ruonan, L., & Al-Shaibani, G. K. S. (2022). An investigation into the use of metadiscourse in undergraduates’ abstracts in social sciences. Topics in Linguistics, 23(2), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2022-0010

Sanosi, A. B. (2024). Revisiting cohesion in academic writing: A corpus-based analysis of EFL learners’ use of conjunctions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i1.70418

Sharma, D. (2022). Making meaningful connections and learning workplace-like business writing through Linkedin and blogging. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 85(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221109188

Stevenson, A., & Baker, S. (2024). What do we know about YouTube content about academic writing? A multimodal analysis. Learning, Media and Technology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2024.2358245

Subekti, M. W., & Santi, A. R. K. (2019). Analysing discourse markers in popular Youtube videos. Journal of Research on Applied Linguistics, Language, and Language Teaching, 2(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.31002/jrlt.v2i2.523

Sundaram, A., Subramaniam, H., Hamid, S. H. A., & Nor, A. M. (2023). A systematic literature review on social media slang analytics in contemporary discourse. IEEE Access, 11, 132457–132471. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3334278

Thornburry, S. (2005). Beyond the sentence: Introducing discourse analysis. Macmillan Publisher.

Traugott, E. C. (2022). Discourse structuring markers in English (Vol. 33). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.33

Tsoy, E. (2022). Functions of Russian verb-derived discourse markers slušaj and smotri from the perspective of information management and interpersonal regulation. Journal of Pragmatics, 193, 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.010

Villares, R. (2023). Exploring rhetorical strategies of tance and engagement in Twitter conference presentations. ESP Today, 11(2), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2023.11.2.5

Wang, Y., & Xie, Q. (2022). Diagnosing EFL undergraduates’ discourse competence in

academic writing. Assessing Writing, 53, 100641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100641

Wu, X., & Yang, H. (2022). Unpacking the functions of personal metadiscourse in

teachers’ classroom discourse. Sustainability, 14(20), 13502. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013502

Yassin, B. (2024). Enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning in Saudi Arabia: the academic contribution of YouTube in EFL learning and cultural awareness. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1451504

Zhang, L., Zhang, L. J., & Xu, T. S. (2023). Effects of teacher explicit instruction in stance-taking on students’ perceptions of stance and on their academic writing beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1140050

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Haura, R., & Musa, A. F. (2025). Discourse Markers in Learners’ YouTube Comments: A Study of Informal Academic English. DUTIES: Education and Humanities International Journal, 1(2), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.70152/duties.v1i2.226